|Course coordinator(s)||M Jaartsveld|
|Lecturer(s)||dr. M Hagens|
|dr. ir. T Hiemstra|
|dr. R Hijbeek|
|prof. dr. RNJ Comans|
|Examiner(s)||prof. dr. RE Creamer|
Language of instruction:
Assumed knowledge on:
Intermediary to advanced knowledge in soil science, e.g. SBL-21806 Soil Quality.
MSc Thesis Soil Biology; MSc Thesis Soil Chemistry and Chemical Soil Quality; MSc Internship Soil Biology; MSc Internship Soil Chemistry and Chemical Soil Quality.
There is an inevitable trade-off between using carbon (as a source of energy, and benefiting from the nutrients released - but accepting a decline in organic matter) and hoarding carbon (to mitigate effects of increasing atmospheric CO2, but sequestering nutrients). This trade-off between different ecosystem functions and services provided by carbon suggests that carbon is subject to a zero-sum game. Could we transform a zero-sum game into a win-win situation: sequestering carbon while also raising energy crops and improving soil fertility? Several (interlinked) scientific controversies that are important for resolving or managing the carbon dilemma will be discussed and novel research questions will be identified.
After successful completion of this course students are expected to be able to:
- quantify and evaluate various and sometimes contrary roles that carbon plays in terrestrial ecosystems;
- critically evaluate scientific papers on the carbon dilemma, including deriving novel research questions;
- put scientific knowledge of the carbon dilemma in a societal context;
- write an unbiased consensus text (Wikipedia) that addresses a major issue of the carbon dilemma.
- literature study;
- writing Wikipedia lemmas.
- handed-in assignments (40%);
- contribution to general discussion (10%);
- Wikipedia lemma (40%);
- contribution to Wikipedia feedback (10%).
For each part a minimum score of 5.0 (scale 0-10).
Links to the pertinent literature (recent primary scientific papers) will be provided through Brightspace